开源中国

我们不支持 IE 10 及以下版本浏览器

It appears you’re using an unsupported browser

为了获得更好的浏览体验,我们强烈建议您使用较新版本的 Chrome、 Firefox、 Safari 等,或者升级到最新版本的IE浏览器。 如果您使用的是 IE 11 或以上版本,请关闭“兼容性视图”。
使用 Go 对 Nginx 进行性能测试 - 技术翻译 - 开源中国社区

使用 Go 对 Nginx 进行性能测试 【已翻译100%】

标签: Nginx Go
oschina 推荐于 4年前 (共 3 段, 翻译完成于 12-16) 评论 16
收藏  
125
推荐标签: Nginx Go 待读

目前有很多提供Go语言HTTP应用服务的方法,但其中最好的选择取决于每个应用的实际情况。目前,Nginx看起来是每个新项目的标准Web服务器,即使在有其他许多不错Web服务器的情况下。然而,在Nginx上提供Go应用服务的开销是多少呢?我们需要一些nginx的特性参数(vhosts,负载均衡,缓存,等等)或者直接使用Go提供服务?如果你需要nginx,最快的连接机制是什么?这就是在这我试图回答的问题。该基准测试的目的不是要验证Go比nginx的快或慢。那将会很愚蠢。

下面是我们要比较不同的设置:

  • Go HTTP standalone (as the control group)
  • Nginx proxy to Go HTTP
  • Nginx fastcgi to Go TCP FastCGI
  • Nginx fastcgi to Go Unix Socket FastCGI
Garfielt
 翻译得不错哦!

硬件

因为我们将在相同的硬件下比较所有设置,硬件选择的是廉价的一个。这不应该是一个大问题。

  • Samsung 笔记本 NP550P5C-AD1BR
  • Intel Core i7 3630QM @2.4GHz (quad core, 8 threads)
  • CPU caches: (L1: 256KiB, L2: 1MiB, L3: 6MiB)
  • RAM 8GiB DDR3 1600MHz

软件

  • Ubuntu 13.10 amd64 Saucy Salamander (updated)
  • Nginx 1.4.4 (1.4.4-1~saucy0 amd64)
  • Go 1.2 (linux/amd64)
  • wrk 3.0.4

设置

内核

只需很小的一点调整,将内核的limits调高。如果你对这一变量有更好的想法,请在写在下面评论处:

fs.file-max                    9999999
fs.nr_open                     9999999
net.core.netdev_max_backlog    4096
net.core.rmem_max              16777216
net.core.somaxconn             65535
net.core.wmem_max              16777216
net.ipv4.ip_forward            0
net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range   1025       65535
net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout       30
net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_time    30
net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog   20480
net.ipv4.tcp_max_tw_buckets    400000
net.ipv4.tcp_no_metrics_save   1
net.ipv4.tcp_syn_retries       2
net.ipv4.tcp_synack_retries    2
net.ipv4.tcp_tw_recycle        1
net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse          1
vm.min_free_kbytes             65536
vm.overcommit_memory           1

Limits

供root和www-data打开的最大文件数限制被配置为200000。

Nginx

有几个必需得Nginx调整。有人跟我说过,我禁用了gzip以保证比较公平。下面是它的配置文件/etc/nginx/nginx.conf:

user www-data;
worker_processes auto;
worker_rlimit_nofile 200000;
pid /var/run/nginx.pid;

events {
    worker_connections 10000;
    use epoll;
    multi_accept on;
}

http {
    sendfile on;
    tcp_nopush on;
    tcp_nodelay on;
    keepalive_timeout 300;
    keepalive_requests 10000;
    types_hash_max_size 2048;

    open_file_cache max=200000 inactive=300s; 
    open_file_cache_valid 300s; 
    open_file_cache_min_uses 2;
    open_file_cache_errors on;

    server_tokens off;
    dav_methods off;

    include /etc/nginx/mime.types;
    default_type application/octet-stream;

    access_log /var/log/nginx/access.log combined;
    error_log /var/log/nginx/error.log warn;

    gzip off;
    gzip_vary off;

    include /etc/nginx/conf.d/*.conf;
    include /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/*.conf;
}

Nginx vhosts

upstream go_http {
    server 127.0.0.1:8080;
    keepalive 300;
}

server {
    listen 80;
    server_name go.http;
    access_log off;
    error_log /dev/null crit;

    location / {
        proxy_pass http://go_http;
        proxy_http_version 1.1;
        proxy_set_header Connection "";
    }
}

upstream go_fcgi_tcp {
    server 127.0.0.1:9001;
    keepalive 300;
}

server {
    listen 80;
    server_name go.fcgi.tcp;
    access_log off;
    error_log /dev/null crit;

    location / {
        include fastcgi_params;
        fastcgi_keep_conn on;
        fastcgi_pass go_fcgi_tcp;
    }
}

upstream go_fcgi_unix {
    server unix:/tmp/go.sock;
    keepalive 300;
}

server {
    listen 80;
    server_name go.fcgi.unix;
    access_log off;
    error_log /dev/null crit;

    location / {
        include fastcgi_params;
        fastcgi_keep_conn on;
        fastcgi_pass go_fcgi_unix;
    }
}

Go源码

package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "log"
    "net"
    "net/http"
    "net/http/fcgi"
    "os"
    "os/signal"
    "syscall"
)

var (
    abort bool
)

const (
    SOCK = "/tmp/go.sock"
)

type Server struct {
}

func (s Server) ServeHTTP(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    body := "Hello World\n"
    // Try to keep the same amount of headers
    w.Header().Set("Server", "gophr")
    w.Header().Set("Connection", "keep-alive")
    w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "text/plain")
    w.Header().Set("Content-Length", fmt.Sprint(len(body)))
    fmt.Fprint(w, body)
}

func main() {
    sigchan := make(chan os.Signal, 1)
    signal.Notify(sigchan, os.Interrupt)
    signal.Notify(sigchan, syscall.SIGTERM)

    server := Server{}

    go func() {
        http.Handle("/", server)
        if err := http.ListenAndServe(":8080", nil); err != nil {
            log.Fatal(err)
        }
    }()

    go func() {
        tcp, err := net.Listen("tcp", ":9001")
        if err != nil {
            log.Fatal(err)
        }
        fcgi.Serve(tcp, server)
    }()

    go func() {
        unix, err := net.Listen("unix", SOCK)
        if err != nil {
            log.Fatal(err)
        }
        fcgi.Serve(unix, server)
    }()

    <-sigchan

    if err := os.Remove(SOCK); err != nil {
        log.Fatal(err)
    }
}
Garfielt
 翻译得不错哦!

检查HTTP header

为公平起见,所有的请求必需大小相同。

$ curl -sI http://127.0.0.1:8080/ 
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Length: 12
Content-Type: text/plain
Server: gophr
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:59:14 GMT

$ curl -sI http://127.0.0.1:8080/ | wc -c
141
$ curl -sI http://go.http/ 
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: nginx
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:59:31 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Length: 12
Connection: keep-alive

$ curl -sI http://go.http/ | wc -c
141
$ curl -sI http://go.fcgi.tcp/ 
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Length: 12
Connection: keep-alive
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:59:40 GMT
Server: gophr

$ curl -sI http://go.fcgi.tcp/ | wc -c
141
$ curl -sI http://go.fcgi.unix/
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Length: 12
Connection: keep-alive
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 15:00:15 GMT
Server: gophr

$ curl -sI http://go.fcgi.unix/ | wc -c
141

启动引擎

  • 使用sysctl配置内核
  • 配置Nginx
  • 配置Nginx vhosts
  • 用www-data启动服务
  • 运行基准测试

基准测试

GOMAXPROCS = 1

Go standalone
# wrk -t100 -c5000 -d30s http://127.0.0.1:8080/
Running 30s test @ http://127.0.0.1:8080/
  100 threads and 5000 connections
  Thread Stats   Avg      Stdev     Max   +/- Stdev
    Latency   116.96ms   17.76ms 173.96ms   85.31%
    Req/Sec   429.16     49.20   589.00     69.44%
  1281567 requests in 29.98s, 215.11MB read
Requests/sec:  42745.15
Transfer/sec:      7.17MB
Nginx + Go through HTTP
# wrk -t100 -c5000 -d30s http://go.http/
Running 30s test @ http://go.http/
  100 threads and 5000 connections
  Thread Stats   Avg      Stdev     Max   +/- Stdev
    Latency   124.57ms   18.26ms 209.70ms   80.17%
    Req/Sec   406.29     56.94     0.87k    89.41%
  1198450 requests in 29.97s, 201.16MB read
Requests/sec:  39991.57
Transfer/sec:      6.71MB
Nginx + Go through FastCGI TCP
# wrk -t100 -c5000 -d30s http://go.fcgi.tcp/
Running 30s test @ http://go.fcgi.tcp/
  100 threads and 5000 connections
  Thread Stats   Avg      Stdev     Max   +/- Stdev
    Latency   514.57ms  119.80ms   1.21s    71.85%
    Req/Sec    97.18     22.56   263.00     79.59%
  287416 requests in 30.00s, 48.24MB read
  Socket errors: connect 0, read 0, write 0, timeout 661
Requests/sec:   9580.75
Transfer/sec:      1.61MB
Nginx + Go through FastCGI Unix Socket
# wrk -t100 -c5000 -d30s http://go.fcgi.unix/
Running 30s test @ http://go.fcgi.unix/
  100 threads and 5000 connections
  Thread Stats   Avg      Stdev     Max   +/- Stdev
    Latency   425.64ms   80.53ms 925.03ms   76.88%
    Req/Sec   117.03     22.13   255.00     81.30%
  350162 requests in 30.00s, 58.77MB read
  Socket errors: connect 0, read 0, write 0, timeout 210
Requests/sec:  11670.72
Transfer/sec:      1.96MB

GOMAXPROCS = 8

Go standalone
# wrk -t100 -c5000 -d30s http://127.0.0.1:8080/
Running 30s test @ http://127.0.0.1:8080/
  100 threads and 5000 connections
  Thread Stats   Avg      Stdev     Max   +/- Stdev
    Latency    39.25ms    8.49ms  86.45ms   81.39%
    Req/Sec     1.29k   129.27     1.79k    69.23%
  3837995 requests in 29.89s, 644.19MB read
Requests/sec: 128402.88
Transfer/sec:     21.55MB
Nginx + Go through HTTP
# wrk -t100 -c5000 -d30s http://go.http/
Running 30s test @ http://go.http/
  100 threads and 5000 connections
  Thread Stats   Avg      Stdev     Max   +/- Stdev
    Latency   336.77ms  297.88ms 632.52ms   60.16%
    Req/Sec     2.36k     2.99k   19.11k    84.83%
  2232068 requests in 29.98s, 374.64MB read
Requests/sec:  74442.91
Transfer/sec:     12.49MB
Nginx + Go through FastCGI TCP
# wrk -t100 -c5000 -d30s http://go.fcgi.tcp/
Running 30s test @ http://go.fcgi.tcp/
  100 threads and 5000 connections
  Thread Stats   Avg      Stdev     Max   +/- Stdev
    Latency   217.69ms  121.22ms   1.80s    75.14%
    Req/Sec   263.09    102.78   629.00     62.54%
  721027 requests in 30.01s, 121.02MB read
  Socket errors: connect 0, read 0, write 176, timeout 1343
Requests/sec:  24026.50
Transfer/sec:      4.03MB
Nginx + Go through FastCGI Unix Socket
# wrk -t100 -c5000 -d30s http://go.fcgi.unix/
Running 30s test @ http://go.fcgi.unix/
  100 threads and 5000 connections
  Thread Stats   Avg      Stdev     Max   +/- Stdev
    Latency   694.32ms  332.27ms   1.79s    62.13%
    Req/Sec   646.86    669.65     6.11k    87.80%
  909836 requests in 30.00s, 152.71MB read
Requests/sec:  30324.77
Transfer/sec:      5.09MB

结论

第一组基准测试时一些Nginx的设置还没有很好的优化(启用gzip,Go的后端没有使用keep-alive连接)。当改为wrk以及按建议优化Nginx后结果有较大差异。

当GOMAXPROCS=1时,Nginx的开销不是那么大,但当OMAXPROCS=8时差异就很大了。以后可能会再试一下其他设置。如果你需要使用Nginx像虚拟主机,负载均衡,缓存等特性,使用HTTP proxy,别使用FastCGI。有些人说Go的FastCGI还没有被很好优化,这也许就是测试结果中巨大差异的原因。

Garfielt
 翻译得不错哦!
本文中的所有译文仅用于学习和交流目的,转载请务必注明文章译者、出处、和本文链接
我们的翻译工作遵照 CC 协议,如果我们的工作有侵犯到您的权益,请及时联系我们
评论(16)
Ctrl/CMD+Enter

不错啊!
牛逼
mark
用go写fastcgi程序?
最近go的资讯很多
搜藏
题目翻译错了吧
是对nginx+go进行测试。。。
而不是用go对Nginx进行测试

引用来自“阿昭”的评论

题目翻译错了吧
是对nginx+go进行测试。。。
而不是用go对Nginx进行测试

楼上说得对
go1.3出来了,你拿go1.2测试。你让我等屌丝情何以堪。
Nginx要跟Go进行Proxy或者FastCGI网络通信,当然没有Go自己单干快.

i7-3630QM是四核八线程,是我就绑定Nginx到后面4个核心,开4个GOMAXPROCS去压看看.
否则前面的wrk和后面的GOMAXPROCS都往Nginx身上堆请求,Nginx又要和GOMAXPROCS争夺CPU,显然会影响测试.
本机对本机测试...这种测试逻辑上就是不严谨,结果也没什么好看的了
不明觉历

引用来自“阿昭”的评论

题目翻译错了吧
是对nginx+go进行测试。。。
而不是用go对Nginx进行测试

no more agree
mark

引用来自“viney”的评论

go1.3出来了,你拿go1.2测试。你让我等屌丝情何以堪。

什么时候1.3出来了??
好强,连接达到这个程度,数据库可能是瓶颈了。
N+G还是有必要的,看来目前还是简单就好。
顶部